Conclusion

ED-M concerns paradigmatic propositional memory knowledge: a belief that p based on remembering that p, where remembering that p is factive and reflectively accessible.

View claim page

Argument

ED-M concerns paradigmatic propositional memory knowledge: a belief that p based on remembering that p, where remembering that p is factive and reflectively accessible.

⟨ ⟩Classification/Definition

Premises (7)

Challenges & responses (0)

No one has tested this argument yet.

An unopposed argument is untested, not proven. Filing a rebut, undercut, or undermine is how its standing gets earned.

Pending critical questions (1)

These are challenges this argument’s reasoning pattern must still withstand. Answering them on Isonomia strengthens the argument.

  • Does the case fit the category?Answer under review
    Draft answer

    The paper identifies the relevant class as memory knowledge that p acquired through remembering that p, where the remembered proposition supplies factive and reflectively accessible support. It further limits the account to memory knowledge involving propositional belief. Paper basis — "ED-M is a claim about memory knowledge that S acquires in virtue of being in possession of rational support R (i.e., remembering that p) for her belief that p , which is both factive" (An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge, p. 7). Reconstructed from Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023); machine-drafted from the paper, filed for review.

Cited by

Cited by 1 · 0 contests

Cite this argument

iso:argument:wqQjlXEUResolve ↗

Citations include the immutable, content-addressed permalink and an sha256 content hash so the cited version is unambiguous.

Embed this argument

<iframe src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/argument/wqQjlXEU" width="600" height="400" frameborder="0" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;" title="Isonomia Argument" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Join the deliberation on Isonomia

Support, challenge, or extend this argument with structured reasoning in Isonomia.