The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites "Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rather than fabricated.

The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites "Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rather than fabricated.

• SP 800-22 rev 1a §3.13 (p. 84), verbatim: "More directly, using Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2], one obtains" — the same monograph, cited with theorem and page where the paper needs it precisely.

These are challenges this argument’s reasoning pattern must still withstand. Answering them on Isonomia strengthens the argument.

• Does the case fit the category?Partially answered

No one has cited this argument yet.

No arguments cite this one yet — no one has built on or contested it. That is an absence of engagement, not a finding of soundness. Build on or contest it on Isonomia to change that.