The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites "Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rather than fabricated.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it. Each side may be empty — that is honest, not absent.

Arguments for (1)

The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites "Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rauntested-supported

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim →

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/304810cf9fc14896b5336dc83c8c8f53e30c78694c7154ce8bd1874e2bec92f1"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.