Search public claims
Every result is a permalink to a claim with tracked arguments, supports, challenges, and evidence with provenance hashes. Looking for full arguments instead? Search arguments.
25 results · most recent first · hybrid retrieval
Unlabeledhybrid Unlabeled1hybrid Household and individual survey data, through topcoding high-income respondents, made the rapid growth of top incomes unobservable until tax data were incorporated into the data infrastructure.
Unlabeledhybrid Rewetting delivers large co-benefits independent of its carbon value - restored biodiversity, improved water quality, reduced flood peaks, halted land subsidence, and lower peat-fire risk - so the case is robust even under a conservative carbon valuation.
Unlabeledhybrid A $50/ton tax would generate approximately $300 billion annually.
Unlabeledhybrid Raising water tables on drained organic soils is among the most cost-effective land-based climate measures: it sharply cuts on-site CO2, and per unit of mitigation it is far cheaper in nitrogen and land than building carbon in mineral soils.
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon tax revenue could fund a $2,000/year dividend to offset household costs.
Unlabeledhybrid EU Member States should fund peatland rewetting through a results-based payment indexed to measured annual mean water-table depth on drained organic soils - paying per hectare-year to keep the table in the shallow band where oxidation is suppressed - financed by reallocating CAP…
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes are an effective policy tool
Unlabeledhybrid The payment should be financed by redirecting CAP area-based direct payments that currently flow to drained organic soils, converting the EU Nature Restoration Regulation's existing but voluntary, unfunded peatland targets into a funded outcome-based instrument.
Unlabeledhybrid Revenue recycling through tax rebates makes carbon taxes progressive
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes have regressive impact on low-income households
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes are simpler and more transparent
Unlabeledhybrid Where volume gains have eroded or boundary harms appeared — congestion creeping back in London despite fewer cars, and housing-price penalties just inside the NYC cordon — the causes were road-space reallocation, broad taxi/private-hire exemptions, and unmitigated boundary effec…
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes risk harming economic competitiveness and low-income households.
Unlabeledhybrid Well-designed carbon taxes with revenue recycling gain public support
Unlabeledhybrid BC's carbon tax achieved 5-15% reduction at $30/ton.
Grounded · Inhybrid Tax incentives disproportionately benefit wealthy property owners who would install solar anyway.
Unlabeledhybrid Energy costs would increase 15-25% under a $50/ton carbon tax.
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes create market incentives for clean energy investment.
Unlabeled1hybrid Peatland restoration is about 3.4 times less nitrogen-costly and far less land-hungry than equivalent mineral-soil carbon sequestration.
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes are more economically efficient than cap-and-trade
Unlabeled2hybrid The 2024 Nature Restoration Regulation sets restoration targets for drained agricultural peatlands (30/40/50% by 2030/40/50) but leaves rewetting voluntary for farmers and provides no dedicated outcome payment.
Unlabeledhybrid Carbon taxes lead to 30% higher investment in clean tech
Unlabeledhybrid Even granting that rewetting cuts on-site emissions cheaply, it does not follow that the policy yields a net climate benefit: taking productive peat out of drained cultivation displaces food production, which can reappear as cropland expansion elsewhere (indirect land-use change…
Unlabeledhybrid Legal challenges could delay carbon tax implementation by 3-5 years.