Claimdf02d0c2b9961e9a345a961bfcd3e6bcc6b7e991fa89e465e5da62e7a200857d·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

Household and individual survey data, through topcoding high-income respondents, made the rapid growth of top incomes unobservable until tax data were incorporated into the data infrastructure.

Evidence (1)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Conceptual framework: discursive demarcations, material boundary work, and statistical representations

it became impossible to observe the rapid growth of incomes at the top of the earnings distribution

https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-2-p7

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/df02d0c2b9961e9a345a961bfcd3e6bcc6b7e991fa89e465e5da62e7a200857d"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond