Argument·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Conclusion

The proposed instrument for this is reflection.

View claim page

Argument

The proposed instrument for this is reflection.

⟨ ⟩Classification/Definition

Premises (3)

  • Bridging the explanatory gap requires first securing subjectivity as the explanandum.
  • Phenomenology is nominated to supply it.
  • Phenomenology's method is reflection.

Challenges & responses (0)

No one has tested this argument yet.

An unopposed argument is untested, not proven. Filing a rebut, undercut, or undermine is how its standing gets earned.

Pending critical questions (1)

These are challenges this argument’s reasoning pattern must still withstand. Answering them on Isonomia strengthens the argument.

  • Does the case fit the category?Open

Cited by

Cited by 1 · 0 contests

Builds on this (1)

Contests this (0)

No contest on file yet.

Cite this argument

iso:argument:CwGBZkNzResolve ↗
Download .txtView raw ↗

Citations include the immutable, content-addressed permalink and an sha256 content hash so the cited version is unambiguous.

Embed this argument

<iframe src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/argument/CwGBZkNz" width="600" height="400" frameborder="0" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;" title="Isonomia Argument" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Join the deliberation on Isonomia

Support, challenge, or extend this argument with structured reasoning in Isonomia.

View full deliberationRespond on Isonomia