Claimf39a2732e2961572979cf0b3e7a21a25b904b838c958a69c4b2e784d82bad309

Claim

The Bakshy et al. study found that individual choice was the larger filter reducing cross-cutting exposure, with algorithmic effects being smaller than user self-selection.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

The Bakshy et al. study found that individual choice was the larger filter reducing cross-cutting exposure, with algorithmic effects being smaller than user self-selection.tested-undermined

Arguments against (1)

The original argument correctly characterized Bakshy et al. as showing that algorithmic effects exist beyond homophily, not that they exceed homophily effects.untested-default

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/f39a2732e2961572979cf0b3e7a21a25b904b838c958a69c4b2e784d82bad309"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond