The original argument correctly characterized Bakshy et al. as showing that algorithmic effects exist beyond homophily, not that they exceed homophily effects.
[DEFENSE-REBUT → v8cm4r] The original premise [1] stated that 'the algorithm contributed an independent additional reduction in cross-cutting exposure beyond homophily' which accurately reflects Bakshy et al.'s finding that both factors contribute. Establishing that algorithmic effects exist beyond homophily is suffic…
Strongest counter:none on file
Cited by:none on file yet