Global self-identification is unevenly distributed across and within countries, and globalization has not generated a general cosmopolitanization trend.

Global self-identification is unevenly distributed across and within countries, and globalization has not generated a general cosmopolitanization trend.

• Contrary to theorists' 1990s and 2000s expectation of increasing cosmopolitan orientations and identities under globalization, subsequent empirical research has found no general cosmopolitanization trend.
  Evidence for this premise (3)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  empirical research since has not shown any such general trend

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p2

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  empirical research since has not shown any such general trend

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p2

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  empirical research since has not shown any such general trend

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p2
• Globalization-related polarization has produced cleavages between more nationally and more cosmopolitan-oriented groups, whose attitudes toward the nation-state, migration, culture, and social cohesion differ significantly.
  Evidence for this premise (3)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  increasing polarization and the formation of new cleavages between somewhat nationally and cosmopolitan-oriented groups

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p1

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  increasing polarization and the formation of new cleavages between somewhat nationally and cosmopolitan-oriented groups

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p1

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  increasing polarization and the formation of new cleavages between somewhat nationally and cosmopolitan-oriented groups

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p1
• People attach very different meanings to identifying as citizens of the world, and the extent of cosmopolitan self-identification varies noticeably both between and within national societies.
  Evidence for this premise (3)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  people mean very different things when they state that they see themselves as “ citizens of the world ”

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p3

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  people mean very different things when they state that they see themselves as “ citizens of the world ”

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p3

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  people mean very different things when they state that they see themselves as “ citizens of the world ”

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p3
• Bourdieu's habitus denotes sociostructurally based patterns of thought, perception, and evaluation and therefore links macro and micro levels.
  Evidence for this premise (1)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  habitus, which refers to people ’ s sociostructurally-based patterns of thought, perception and evaluation, thus linking macro and micro levels

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p7
• Research indicates that global identification differs across countries with societal factors such as affluence or globalization and with individual factors such as age, class, education, and residence, but these factors need not have the same effects in every country.
  Evidence for this premise (3)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  these factors do not necessarily have the same effect across countries

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p4

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  these factors do not necessarily have the same effect across countries

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p4

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  these factors do not necessarily have the same effect across countries

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p4
• Existing research often uses psychological accounts, including group threat and values, that generally posit stable trans-situational effects across diverse societal contexts.
  Evidence for this premise (3)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  research often relies on psychological notions such as group threat

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p6

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  research often relies on psychological notions such as group threat

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p6

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  research often relies on psychological notions such as group threat

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p6
• Although the literature agrees that cosmopolitan orientations and identities manifest differently across societies, it lacks agreement on a theoretical account of the macro–micro interplay.
  Evidence for this premise (3)

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  there is much less agreement on how to account theoretically for this interplay of macroand micro-level factors

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p5

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  there is much less agreement on how to account theoretically for this interplay of macroand micro-level factors

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p5

  Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Problem: globalization, cosmopolitan identification, and cross-national variation

  there is much less agreement on how to account theoretically for this interplay of macroand micro-level factors

  https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-1-p5

These are challenges this argument’s reasoning pattern must still withstand. Answering them on Isonomia strengthens the argument.

• Does the operational measure of F in the sample actually capture F as it is meant in the population-level claim?Open
• Is the sample actually representative of the target population on the dimensions that matter for F (demographics, behavior, time period, platform mix)?Open
• Is the sample large enough to support the precision (margin m) being claimed?Open
• Does the conclusion stay within the population P from which S was drawn, or does it overreach (different country, different time period, different platform)?Open
• Was the sample drawn or recruited in a way that systematically biases the proportion of F (e.g., volunteer bias, opt-in panels, attrition)?Open

Cited by 1 · 0 contests