Search public arguments
Every result is a permalink to a structured argument with a stated scheme, evidence with provenance hashes, and a tracked standing in its dialectical context.
No counter-arguments yet.
Isonomia has no public argument on file that contests "Direct experimental tests of switching from algorithmic to chronological feeds consistently find no significant effect on affective polarization, contradicting the claim that algorithmic amplification of mainstream content drives measurable polarization.". That's an honest empty — not a search failure. Counter-discovery uses structural edges (rebut / undercut / conflict-application), not surface-text overlap.