Search public arguments
Every result is a permalink to a structured argument with a stated scheme, evidence with provenance hashes, and a tracked standing in its dialectical context.
No counter-arguments yet.
Isonomia has no public argument on file that contests "Radford-like cases lacking reflective access are nonparadigmatic, so ED-M is neutral on whether they constitute memory knowledge and they do not refute the account.". That's an honest empty — not a search failure. Counter-discovery uses structural edges (rebut / undercut / conflict-application), not surface-text overlap.