Claimff9f603ada6f4bcf3f0582b0d0c66a7706365c5a4d416b3f65595a258dcd5f58·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Claim

Husserl: this holds only if subjectivity is taken as a natural object; epoché and reduction de-naturalize it.

Evidence (1)

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Husserl: Reflection Brought to Evidence

a sphere of pure and possibly perfectly clear data.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

Husserl: this holds only if subjectivity is taken as a natural object; epoché and reduction de-naturalize it.untested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/ff9f603ada6f4bcf3f0582b0d0c66a7706365c5a4d416b3f65595a258dcd5f58"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond