Claimfab0d9e07e1d956d0cfea6f2c67c3001f0fd9fac8f5192bbd4a4aac863e83a07·My Arguments

Claim

Empirical evidence demonstrates that Registered Reports dramatically reduce the inflated positive-result rate: standard reports show 96% positive results versus only 44% in Registered Reports, a gap that measures the extent of selective reporting in conventional publishing.

Evidence (1)

Scheel, Schijen & Lakens (2021) An Excess of Positive Results, AMPPS

Found 96% positive results in standard reports versus 44% in Registered Reports across psychology.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25152459211007467

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/fab0d9e07e1d956d0cfea6f2c67c3001f0fd9fac8f5192bbd4a4aac863e83a07"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond