Claimfab0d9e07e1d956d0cfea6f2c67c3001f0fd9fac8f5192bbd4a4aac863e83a07·My Arguments

Empirical evidence demonstrates that Registered Reports dramatically reduce the inflated positive-result rate: standard reports show 96% positive results versus only 44% in Registered Reports, a gap that measures the extent of selective reporting in conventional publishing.

Evidence (1)

Scheel, Schijen & Lakens (2021) An Excess of Positive Results, AMPPS
Found 96% positive results in standard reports versus 44% in Registered Reports across psychology.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25152459211007467

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/fab0d9e07e1d956d0cfea6f2c67c3001f0fd9fac8f5192bbd4a4aac863e83a07"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.