Claimf6227a891d289d581ba68594615402a8f87c9a2782cda9dc0bec6b9f2f750161·Paper reconstruction — Maria Esipova (2025), In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force

Claim

Both TG's account and the standard account treat exclamatives' descriptive/truth-conditional content as presupposed, so they make the same predictions about its direct deniability; simple No/Nah plus correction is a general-purpose denial form that can target at least some presuppositions.

Evidence (3)

In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding
both approaches actually make the same predictions
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p4
In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding
both approaches actually make the same predictions
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p4
In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding
both approaches actually make the same predictions
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p4

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/f6227a891d289d581ba68594615402a8f87c9a2782cda9dc0bec6b9f2f750161"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond