Both TG's account and the standard account treat exclamatives' descriptive/truth-conditional content as presupposed, so they make the same predictions about its direct deniability; simple No/Nah plus correction is a general-purpose denial form that can target at least some presuppositions.

Evidence (3)

In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding

both approaches actually make the same predictions

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p4

In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding

both approaches actually make the same predictions

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p4

In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding

both approaches actually make the same predictions

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p4

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/f6227a891d289d581ba68594615402a8f87c9a2782cda9dc0bec6b9f2f750161"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.