Claimf5db0f49fb29b1f7c4b89a1a37df5b98d04c8842954e255211ba2d4544c8c9c1·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Claim

Reflection leaves the pre-reflexive Ego intact: it is a consummation or disclosing intensification of what is already lived, not a falsifying mirror, so no structural split follows from reflective self-givenness.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

Reflection leaves the pre-reflexive Ego intact: it is a consummation or disclosing intensification of what is already lived, not a falsifying mirror, so no structural split follows from reflective seltested-undermined

Arguments against (1)

The alternative — that reflection leaves the pre-reflexive intact — is self-defeating, since such reflection would be superfluous.untested-default

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/f5db0f49fb29b1f7c4b89a1a37df5b98d04c8842954e255211ba2d4544c8c9c1"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond