Claimefac7a20f974d1710ad41cfd0081b042e007769c5bd3280c67ea3140e633d663·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

Because the accounts relied on market transactions, nonmonetary transactions—including utility exchanges outside markets—became empirically unobservable to economists.

Evidence (2)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
making any nonmonetary economic transactions, including the exchange of utilities outside of market transactions, impossible to observe
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p4
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
making any nonmonetary economic transactions, including the exchange of utilities outside of market transactions, impossible to observe
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p4

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/efac7a20f974d1710ad41cfd0081b042e007769c5bd3280c67ea3140e633d663"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond