Claime0653e4e51cd79750dd002b7e615e1e24a283c7611b7bdc67b7007ea6bf5214d·Paper reconstruction — Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023), An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge

Claim

ED-P rejects UP1 for paradigmatic perceptual beliefs: S's factive support is unavailable to her envatted counterpart and is therefore better support, favouring p over the brain-in-a-vat hypothesis.

Evidence (2)

An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Pritchardean perceptual disjunctivism: formulation, advantages, and responses to its standard problems
S has rational support that does favour the belief that p over the brain in a vat hypothesis.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-2-p6
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Pritchardean perceptual disjunctivism: formulation, advantages, and responses to its standard problems
S has rational support that does favour the belief that p over the brain in a vat hypothesis.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-2-p6

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/e0653e4e51cd79750dd002b7e615e1e24a283c7611b7bdc67b7007ea6bf5214d"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond