Like ED-P, ED-M combines an internalist element (reflective accessibility) with an externalist element (factivity), and thus satisfies both kinds of intuition.
Evidence (3)
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Parity argument: ED-M inherits ED-P’s advantages and parallel responses to the access, distinguishability, and basis problems
reflective accessibility is an internalist requirement and factivity is an externalist requirement.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-4-p2
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Parity argument: ED-M inherits ED-P’s advantages and parallel responses to the access, distinguishability, and basis problems
reflective accessibility is an internalist requirement and factivity is an externalist requirement.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-4-p2
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Parity argument: ED-M inherits ED-P’s advantages and parallel responses to the access, distinguishability, and basis problems
reflective accessibility is an internalist requirement and factivity is an externalist requirement.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-4-p2
Respond to this claim on Isonomia
Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.