Claimd8002df980f25b8b707965208f9e8e1faa8a2f2aa8b9536d735454ff912aabf0·Paper reconstruction — Sebastian Bücking (2025), Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions

Claim

On the emotive-assertion account, an emotion is predicated of a subject and could in principle be attributed to any subject, time, or place; thus origo orientation does not follow directly.

Evidence (3)

Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
The emotive attitude would hinge on a regular predication of a subject
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p3
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
The emotive attitude would hinge on a regular predication of a subject
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p3
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
The emotive attitude would hinge on a regular predication of a subject
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/d8002df980f25b8b707965208f9e8e1faa8a2f2aa8b9536d735454ff912aabf0"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond