Claimd4634d1976d44ff72916c07d8affe65bc8af7aa64aab32ca6f2f47e5b209ad00·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

By imposing no ethical or practical qualifiers on utility transfers, national accounts also excluded earlier moral and practical limits on what market transactions should count as productive.

Evidence (2)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
national accounts simultaneously removed from the table any ethical or other practical limits
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p5
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
national accounts simultaneously removed from the table any ethical or other practical limits
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p5

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/d4634d1976d44ff72916c07d8affe65bc8af7aa64aab32ca6f2f47e5b209ad00"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond