Claimc52667e4cec81ad423ed8142861fcd3dafdc05d8d0d74236f8a734967d463f2f·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

Second-group exclamatives only seem deniable because their explicitly scale-indicating elements, such as groß and schnell, can be rejected.

Evidence (3)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Deniability evidence and the three-way German classification
Exclamatives like (8) seem to be deniable only because they include an explicitly scale-indicating element ( groß, schnell ) that can be rejected.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-2-p3
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Deniability evidence and the three-way German classification
Exclamatives like (8) seem to be deniable only because they include an explicitly scale-indicating element ( groß, schnell ) that can be rejected.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-2-p3
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Deniability evidence and the three-way German classification
Exclamatives like (8) seem to be deniable only because they include an explicitly scale-indicating element ( groß, schnell ) that can be rejected.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-2-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/c52667e4cec81ad423ed8142861fcd3dafdc05d8d0d74236f8a734967d463f2f"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond