Claimc1cb3f23604d567077e7177f26a006a85f2c2a736e6f07572446d22a6609d63d·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

The broader prompt in (18A) can be matched by many narratives, including narratives in (19), so an exclamative's apparent suitability there does not show that it answers a question.

Evidence (3)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Semantic non-equivalence of exclamatives and emotive-predicate assertions
The narratives work as replies, but it seems questionable to call them ‘ answers ’ .
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-4-p3
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Semantic non-equivalence of exclamatives and emotive-predicate assertions
The narratives work as replies, but it seems questionable to call them ‘ answers ’ .
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-4-p3
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Semantic non-equivalence of exclamatives and emotive-predicate assertions
The narratives work as replies, but it seems questionable to call them ‘ answers ’ .
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-4-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/c1cb3f23604d567077e7177f26a006a85f2c2a736e6f07572446d22a6609d63d"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond