Claimc192fd39fa5e8c36fd4ac9b350679236e904fa55450b670a308c178a9fb13688·Paper reconstruction — Maria Esipova (2025), In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force

Claim

TG's denial and question-addressing tests do not establish that exclamatives' affect-related content is truth-conditional and at issue, since the relevant truth-conditional content is predicted to be presupposed on both accounts and question coherence is not itself assertion evidence.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

TG's denial and question-addressing tests do not establish that exclamatives' affect-related content is truth-conditional and at issue, since the relevant truth-conditional content is predicted to be untested-supported

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/c192fd39fa5e8c36fd4ac9b350679236e904fa55450b670a308c178a9fb13688"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond