Claimbd8d4050566691fd42b541152502fe2b64901a616a57b8a1d274baf48d52d104·Paper reconstruction — Sebastian Bücking (2025), Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions

Claim

The author's judgment is that answering by demonstration is marked and only felicitous when the question is understood relatively loosely, as with the how-question combined with think.

Evidence (3)

Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Question–answer behavior does not establish assertive identity
answering by demonstration is a marked strategy that addresses the given question in an indirect way.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-2-p6
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Question–answer behavior does not establish assertive identity
answering by demonstration is a marked strategy that addresses the given question in an indirect way.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-2-p6
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Question–answer behavior does not establish assertive identity
answering by demonstration is a marked strategy that addresses the given question in an indirect way.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-2-p6

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/bd8d4050566691fd42b541152502fe2b64901a616a57b8a1d274baf48d52d104"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond