Claimb42716b0e60e0aa91b77ef303e33726d40e68cb9882e09af045d1f4d76bafb0b·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Claim

Hence it is incomplete with respect to its own ambition.

Evidence (1)

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — The Explanatory Gap and the Reflective Question

cognitive science is incomplete and found wanting with respect to (a)

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/b42716b0e60e0aa91b77ef303e33726d40e68cb9882e09af045d1f4d76bafb0b"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond