Claimb41d4604571e1b81765ad8824aab62c1895721db8ab1424a5d17c63be0c5170f·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

Across the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, political economists debated the productive–unproductive labour boundary because it was central to their account of wealth accumulation.

Evidence (1)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Problem, position, and contribution: the production boundary as a case of statistical redefinition

this distinction was central to their understanding of the process of wealth accumulation across societies.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-1-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/b41d4604571e1b81765ad8824aab62c1895721db8ab1424a5d17c63be0c5170f"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond