Cultural and economic capital have country-specific effects, so cosmopolitanism is an elite project only in some countries and the two upper-class fractions usually differ in global self-identification.

Evidence (1)

Habitus, Globalization, and Cosmopolitanism: How Dispositions, Class, and Migration Shape Global Self-Identification Differently in 74 Countries — Synthesis: context-dependent configurations and caution against universal habitus labels

Cosmopolitanism can therefore be described as an “ elite project ” in some countries, but not in all

https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261430381#unit-7-p6

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/b269d0ad74e73ba1112bf18d71b0bae26e1728533b47b837c0c0ac14c7a26629"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.