Claima945e8f70103f18e1bd736d10d9223bf86cb32a1128f5098fd972abe3230dc85·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

Although an exclamative response such as (17B) may be suitable after “Erzähl mal” (“Tell me”), its acceptability may vary and it is not obvious that this prompt counts as a question.

Evidence (2)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Answerhood evidence and the distinction between answers and narrative replies
the main problem seems to be that it is not obvious in which sense (17A) counts as a question
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-3-p3
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Answerhood evidence and the distinction between answers and narrative replies
the main problem seems to be that it is not obvious in which sense (17A) counts as a question
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-3-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/a945e8f70103f18e1bd736d10d9223bf86cb32a1128f5098fd972abe3230dc85"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond