Claim9e172d41aa3ea0de1d9dfb0bf0f3d3aee3e133f7a641e4bb5fe3a97d13524df4·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

By the mid-twentieth century, national income accounting statistics had become the dominant means of statistically representing economies.

Evidence (2)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
the development of national income accounting statistics as the dominant way to statistically represent economies by the mid-twentieth century
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p1
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
the development of national income accounting statistics as the dominant way to statistically represent economies by the mid-twentieth century
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p1

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/9e172d41aa3ea0de1d9dfb0bf0f3d3aee3e133f7a641e4bb5fe3a97d13524df4"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond