Claim91dc1d8cbb5cc68543ca5e4b78f078dfd927bbf889eeef8707b3d080f45537e9·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

The failed-or-unrealized-utility frame had more adherents than the moral frame but did not survive into the mid-twentieth century.

Evidence (3)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
it ultimately did not survive into the mid-twentieth century.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p6
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
it ultimately did not survive into the mid-twentieth century.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p6
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
it ultimately did not survive into the mid-twentieth century.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p6

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/91dc1d8cbb5cc68543ca5e4b78f078dfd927bbf889eeef8707b3d080f45537e9"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond