Claim91a9efab2807691eb8b3357afcb08214746f53d38a3d6632e9e89c7a9d4c1117·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

A generic utilities frame defined production simply as the creation of utility, without specifying what counts as utility or how to measure it.

Evidence (3)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
Any activity which contributes to the creation of utilities in either of these ways is production
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p3
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
Any activity which contributes to the creation of utilities in either of these ways is production
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p3
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
Any activity which contributes to the creation of utilities in either of these ways is production
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/91a9efab2807691eb8b3357afcb08214746f53d38a3d6632e9e89c7a9d4c1117"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond