Claim8cbe22534872a8f95792e04e974e5c67d1e4f42778fb2c30bb71661050e10ac3·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

TaG's assertion that exclamatives' descriptive content can always be denied is insufficiently supported.

Evidence (1)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Synthesis: limits of TaG’s argument and need for further support

the assertion that the descriptive content of exclamatives can always be denied is not su ffi ciently substantiated.

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-5-p1

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/8cbe22534872a8f95792e04e974e5c67d1e4f42778fb2c30bb71661050e10ac3"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond