Claim8c2f05e0e0be894d1e235211ee2bd03d8125819898f0f48d8f479cae3a198716·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

National income accounts, the dominant economic statistical representation, measured primarily market transactions and thereby made nonmonetary utility exchanges, including unpaid household work, unobservable.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

National income accounts, the dominant economic statistical representation, measured primarily market transactions and thereby made nonmonetary utility exchanges, including unpaid household work, unobuntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/8c2f05e0e0be894d1e235211ee2bd03d8125819898f0f48d8f479cae3a198716"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond