Claim8a04fc0cbaa4f2143ce32074aa1ccd431abfe097ba6a1fdd455c5307d5c849a4·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

National accounting statistics became embedded in economists' empirical work and supplied a paid–unpaid distinction rather than abandoning the prior boundary.

Evidence (1)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Problem, position, and contribution: the production boundary as a case of statistical redefinition

This new distinction was embedded in the emerging national accounting statistics that economists increasingly organized their empirical work around.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-1-p6

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/8a04fc0cbaa4f2143ce32074aa1ccd431abfe097ba6a1fdd455c5307d5c849a4"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond