Claim885364275b16e5fd83031a6ebbe6682b17918eb753db3724dad17f58e5d6f868·Paper reconstruction — Sebastian Bücking (2025), Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions

Claim

Trotzke and Giannakidou’s uniform analysis is intended to avoid positing exclamatives as a distinct sentence type with its own illocutionary force.

Evidence (3)

Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Framing the dispute: exclamatives versus emotive assertions
The proposal captures this intuition within a uniform approach and thus avoids the assumption that exclamatives form a separate sentence type with its own illocutionary force.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-1-p4
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Framing the dispute: exclamatives versus emotive assertions
The proposal captures this intuition within a uniform approach and thus avoids the assumption that exclamatives form a separate sentence type with its own illocutionary force.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-1-p4
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Framing the dispute: exclamatives versus emotive assertions
The proposal captures this intuition within a uniform approach and thus avoids the assumption that exclamatives form a separate sentence type with its own illocutionary force.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-1-p4

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/885364275b16e5fd83031a6ebbe6682b17918eb753db3724dad17f58e5d6f868"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond