Claim7ebb86baea0ccda9ce8e1656ba7c65bde7df31a50aad7ed20778fecd2ff996f5

Claim

Individual-level causal effects of algorithmic animosity amplification on affective polarization, operating through a mechanism present on multiple platforms reaching a supermajority of US adults, make it plausible — though not formally demonstrated — that the population-level contribution exceeds 10% of observed affective polarization growth.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

Individual-level causal effects of algorithmic animosity amplification on affective polarization, operating through a mechanism present on multiple platforms reaching a supermajority of US adults, makuntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/7ebb86baea0ccda9ce8e1656ba7c65bde7df31a50aad7ed20778fecd2ff996f5"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond