Claim7812e37911394d8ab0a5795c007ff9e2c1019e9fd5a7fb43ed3fd8a20bfa69e7·Paper reconstruction — Sebastian Bücking (2025), Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions

Claim

Origo orientation does not behave like a cancellable implicature: in example (20c), a context that should force a [-origo] interpretation makes the exclamative completely impossible.

Evidence (3)

Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
the putative implicature cannot be canceled by an appropriate context
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p5
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
the putative implicature cannot be canceled by an appropriate context
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p5
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
the putative implicature cannot be canceled by an appropriate context
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p5

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/7812e37911394d8ab0a5795c007ff9e2c1019e9fd5a7fb43ed3fd8a20bfa69e7"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond