Claim7812e37911394d8ab0a5795c007ff9e2c1019e9fd5a7fb43ed3fd8a20bfa69e7·Paper reconstruction — Sebastian Bücking (2025), Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions

Origo orientation does not behave like a cancellable implicature: in example (20c), a context that should force a [-origo] interpretation makes the exclamative completely impossible.

Evidence (3)

Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
the putative implicature cannot be canceled by an appropriate context
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p5
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
the putative implicature cannot be canceled by an appropriate context
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p5
Empirical and theoretical arguments against equating exclamatives and emotive assertions — Origo dependence, free indirect discourse, and the nature of exclamative attitude
the putative implicature cannot be canceled by an appropriate context
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2001#unit-5-p5

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/7812e37911394d8ab0a5795c007ff9e2c1019e9fd5a7fb43ed3fd8a20bfa69e7"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.