Claim742b292a8944922fd67425c6e9f3c112859b64379dd6a9e5188d9d6d855666b3·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

For the exclamative with the scale-indicating element schnell in (23A), the verification check questions Eliud Kipchoge's degree of speed rather than the speaker's emotion.

Evidence (3)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Semantic non-equivalence of exclamatives and emotive-predicate assertions
Questioned is the degree of Eliud Kipchoge ’ s speed, not the speaker ’ s emotion.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-4-p6
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Semantic non-equivalence of exclamatives and emotive-predicate assertions
Questioned is the degree of Eliud Kipchoge ’ s speed, not the speaker ’ s emotion.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-4-p6
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Semantic non-equivalence of exclamatives and emotive-predicate assertions
Questioned is the degree of Eliud Kipchoge ’ s speed, not the speaker ’ s emotion.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-4-p6

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/742b292a8944922fd67425c6e9f3c112859b64379dd6a9e5188d9d6d855666b3"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond