Claim727cabd3ccc34cb144f568ca59d6ed5c892baef5deb653df284f476a0fda1576·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Claim

Cognitive science does not (yet) account for this dimension.

Evidence (1)

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — The Explanatory Gap and the Reflective Question

cognitive science does not attempt or (up until now) fails to account for this subjective dimension

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/727cabd3ccc34cb144f568ca59d6ed5c892baef5deb653df284f476a0fda1576"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond