Claim6ede20055ecd15902a193397dd28cae1dc7b359d27cf4e0e0ef31bab1ac7241b·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

The accounts' primary inclusion criterion was market transactions; consequently, market transactions came to define productive activity.

Evidence (2)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
The primary criterion national accounts used were market transactions
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p3
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — National accounts institutionalize commodified utility and convert productive labour into paid labour
The primary criterion national accounts used were market transactions
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-6-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/6ede20055ecd15902a193397dd28cae1dc7b359d27cf4e0e0ef31bab1ac7241b"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond