Claim6ea7a2a88be21b8dc78b495123a8f77b6ad1c29890a1f81b472174cc3b20b3b5·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

TaG challenge reported judgments that a response with no to an exclamative is ill-formed; English speakers they consulted reportedly had no trouble responding no to the relevant English exclamative.

Evidence (2)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Reconstruction of TaG’s no-exclamation-force claim
English speakers we consulted find no trouble responding no to this sentence
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-1-p5
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Reconstruction of TaG’s no-exclamation-force claim
English speakers we consulted find no trouble responding no to this sentence
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-1-p5

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/6ea7a2a88be21b8dc78b495123a8f77b6ad1c29890a1f81b472174cc3b20b3b5"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond