Claim6ae38e80401f6b8bd3f5691c2daba586303a096e0c8e592cc08ffd0e553391d1·Paper reconstruction — Andreas Trotzke & Anastasia Giannakidou (2025), The landscape of exclamations: brief musings on emotive language

Claim

The authors agree that direct denial after the elliptical forms in (9) is stranger than denial after the non-elliptical forms in (10), but judge weak denial strategies after (9) to be acceptable; whether Esipova shares that judgment remains unknown.

Evidence (2)

The landscape of exclamations: brief musings on emotive language — Judgment disagreement and the case for experimental evidence
we do think that the weak denial strategies (which are generally preferred by subjects in analogous judgments; see Trotzke 2019) sound just fine
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2008#unit-3-p6
The landscape of exclamations: brief musings on emotive language — Judgment disagreement and the case for experimental evidence
we do think that the weak denial strategies (which are generally preferred by subjects in analogous judgments; see Trotzke 2019) sound just fine
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2008#unit-3-p6

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/6ae38e80401f6b8bd3f5691c2daba586303a096e0c8e592cc08ffd0e553391d1"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond