Claim52b1e442f01699bff01de7acb924e95f8d069e8cbe95f62f010b7bddd72ce7e6

Claim

Guess et al. (2023) null findings do not rule out algorithmic effects below the study's minimum detectable effect size or effects on non-volunteer subpopulations with different baseline polarization levels.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

Guess et al. (2023) null findings do not rule out algorithmic effects below the study's minimum detectable effect size or effects on non-volunteer subpopulations with different baseline polarization luntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/52b1e442f01699bff01de7acb924e95f8d069e8cbe95f62f010b7bddd72ce7e6"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond