Claim51b15dfd099dea7f51b837984e2c9ed53035c0c983ba8c025f2e5015f9f3fb15·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Claim

The pre-reflective immediacy that reflection seems to lose is an après-coup illusion: it is produced by the failure, not lost to it — so the split is ontological, not epistemological.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

The pre-reflective immediacy that reflection seems to lose is an après-coup illusion: it is produced by the failure, not lost to it — so the split is ontological, not epistemological.untested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/51b15dfd099dea7f51b837984e2c9ed53035c0c983ba8c025f2e5015f9f3fb15"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond