Claim4d723ad6de3c6050ecee1fd4a54b43afed8eb21739d5d845a85722681ac6e099·Paper reconstruction — Andreas Trotzke & Anastasia Giannakidou (2024), Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion

Claim

Greek wh-exclamatives use ti ‘what’ plus an adjective and the complementizer pu; pu is optional but strongly preferred in this construction.

Evidence (3)

Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion — Greek evidence and the syntax-semantics of emotive assertions
Pu is optional, but strongly preferred.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2024-2022#unit-3-p2
Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion — Greek evidence and the syntax-semantics of emotive assertions
Pu is optional, but strongly preferred.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2024-2022#unit-3-p2
Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion — Greek evidence and the syntax-semantics of emotive assertions
Pu is optional, but strongly preferred.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2024-2022#unit-3-p2

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/4d723ad6de3c6050ecee1fd4a54b43afed8eb21739d5d845a85722681ac6e099"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond