Claim4d723ad6de3c6050ecee1fd4a54b43afed8eb21739d5d845a85722681ac6e099·Paper reconstruction — Andreas Trotzke & Anastasia Giannakidou (2024), Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion

Greek wh-exclamatives use ti ‘what’ plus an adjective and the complementizer pu; pu is optional but strongly preferred in this construction.

Evidence (3)

Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion — Greek evidence and the syntax-semantics of emotive assertions
Pu is optional, but strongly preferred.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2024-2022#unit-3-p2
Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion — Greek evidence and the syntax-semantics of emotive assertions
Pu is optional, but strongly preferred.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2024-2022#unit-3-p2
Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion — Greek evidence and the syntax-semantics of emotive assertions
Pu is optional, but strongly preferred.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2024-2022#unit-3-p2

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/4d723ad6de3c6050ecee1fd4a54b43afed8eb21739d5d845a85722681ac6e099"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.