Claim484ab6fdd573d66709a0a5277f0c357ea27500a7f0e478fcdf2f36410683a46c·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

TaG's argument that exclamatives can answer information-seeking questions succeeds only in expanded narrative contexts.

Evidence (1)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Synthesis: limits of TaG’s argument and need for further support

the argument that exclamative sentences can serve as answers to information-seeking questions holds only in expanded narrative contexts.

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-5-p4

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/484ab6fdd573d66709a0a5277f0c357ea27500a7f0e478fcdf2f36410683a46c"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond