Claim46612c29b7e44b39c11b0043aa08a662b5fe6339762496192902dd833dd2b730·Paper reconstruction — Maria Esipova (2025), In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force

Claim

The contrast in denial behavior cannot be explained merely by the claim that emotional states cannot be denied, since one can accuse someone of pretending after expressive acts but not of lying or saying something false.

Evidence (3)

In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding
you can accuse one of pretending in response to expressive speech acts
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p3
In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding
you can accuse one of pretending in response to expressive speech acts
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p3
In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force — Discourse behavior: denials, question-addressing, and embedding
you can accuse one of pretending in response to expressive speech acts
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2007#unit-3-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/46612c29b7e44b39c11b0043aa08a662b5fe6339762496192902dd833dd2b730"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond