Claim45f76e8dfaf6410c2aadbff9a1a44febd976ce72d11b219f1ea8285da3a89bdc·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

By structuring economic analysis around what could be counted in national accounts, the accounts enforced the commodified-utilities frame and transformed productive labour into paid labour.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

By structuring economic analysis around what could be counted in national accounts, the accounts enforced the commodified-utilities frame and transformed productive labour into paid labour.untested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/45f76e8dfaf6410c2aadbff9a1a44febd976ce72d11b219f1ea8285da3a89bdc"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond