Claim4494c457fccb6d470602513a5583217d70636c57e748f30f11905f8b8048598f

Claim

The dissociation between exposure change and attitude change in the Guess et al. (2023) experiment provides valid causal evidence that algorithmic exposure differences are not responsible for polarization at detectable magnitudes.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

The dissociation between exposure change and attitude change in the Guess et al. (2023) experiment provides valid causal evidence that algorithmic exposure differences are not responsible for polarizauntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/4494c457fccb6d470602513a5583217d70636c57e748f30f11905f8b8048598f"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond