Claim3c4aa8f946dfab6986f0216d77e7c77bc5d236127cfdb824792a891889199f19·Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960

Claim

The marginal revolution shifted economics' object of knowledge from material wealth to utility, understood as the capacity of material objects or immaterial services to satisfy desires, wants, or needs.

Evidence (3)

What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
the object of knowledge for economists shifted from the production and distribution of wealth , where wealth is conceived of as material goods, to the satisfaction of utility
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p1
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
the object of knowledge for economists shifted from the production and distribution of wealth , where wealth is conceived of as material goods, to the satisfaction of utility
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p1
What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960 — Post-marginal-revolution contestation: utility expands the producer boundary, but competing frames persist
the object of knowledge for economists shifted from the production and distribution of wealth , where wealth is conceived of as material goods, to the satisfaction of utility
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2404355#unit-5-p1

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/3c4aa8f946dfab6986f0216d77e7c77bc5d236127cfdb824792a891889199f19"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond